Key result
TAVI in calcified bicuspid aortic valve leads to early structural degeneration and explantation at 4 years.
Why the study?
The use of TAVI in younger, lower-risk patients with AS and bicuspid aortic valve remains controversial due to limited durability data and their exclusion from major RCTs.
Case Report (n=1)
No
This case illustrates the risks of premature structural valve deterioration and conduction disturbances when performing TAVI in young patients with bicuspid aortic valves, reinforcing the guideline recommendation for surgical aortic valve replacement in this population.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early degeneration after TAVI in young bicuspid patients warrants caution; leaves open durability questions in low-risk bicuspid populations.
Background Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the recommended treatment for severe aortic stenosis (AS) in patients ≥ 70 years old or those deemed high surgical risk. While there is growing interest in the expansion if its use to younger, lower risk patients with AS and select groups of patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), it’s use in these individuals remains controversial due to limited durability data and the exclusion of these groups from major randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Case summary A 28-year-old woman with a history of congenital BAV and prior balloon valvuloplasty in infancy, underwent TAVI with a 27 mm SAPIEN-3 valve overseas, aged 24. At four years post-TAVI, she presented to hospital following an episode of presyncope and dyspnea. ECG showed left bundle branch block (LBBB). Echocardiography demonstrated a well seated TAVI but severe restenosis with a maximum velocity of 5.5 m/s and a mean pressure gradient of 79 mmHg. Normal coronaries without ostial compromise and no significant aortopathy was observed on CT coronary angiogram. The patient underwent surgery with a modified Bentall procedure and implantation of a 23 mm St. Jude mechanical valve. Histology revealed degenerative valvular changes without hypoattenuated leaflet thickening. Her post-operative period was unremarkable. Conclusion This case illustrates the potential risks of performing TAVI in a young patient with severely calcified BAV, including conduction disturbance, structural valve degeneration and avoidable intervention to a normal aorta. The paucity of long-term outcome data precludes the use of TAVI in young, low-risk BAV patients and recommended intervention for severe AS in these individuals remains SAVR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McGuire et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Severe aortic stenosis in bicuspid aortic valve (n=1). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was evaluated on Structural valve deterioration. TAVI in a young patient with severely calcified bicuspid aortic valve resulted in early structural valve degeneration and conduction disturbance requiring surgical explantation at 4 years.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: