Key result
Combined lifestyle interventions significantly improve BMI, glucose, LDL, BP, and triglycerides in cancer survivors.
Why the study?
Unhealthy lifestyle behaviors contribute to cardiometabolic abnormalities in cancer survivors, and combined lifestyle interventions addressing multiple behaviors simultaneously may offer superior cardioprotective effects.
Do combined lifestyle interventions improve cardiometabolic risk factors in cancer survivors?
Meta-Analysis
Do combined lifestyle interventions improve cardiometabolic risk factors in cancer survivors?
Combined lifestyle interventions provide modest but statistically significant improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors such as BMI, glucose, and lipids among cancer survivors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports CLIs for BMI reduction in cancer survivors; extends RCT evidence on cardiometabolic benefits.
Purpose Unhealthy lifestyle behaviors are significant and adjustable contributors to cardiometabolic abnormalities among cancer survivors. Combined lifestyle interventions (CLIs), addressing multiple behaviors simultaneously, may offer superior cardioprotective effects. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized evidence on existing CLIs and evaluated their effectiveness in reducing cardiometabolic risk. Methods A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, SinoMed, and Yiigle until December 3, 2025, following the PRISMA checklist. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using random-effects models. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also assessed. Results Of the 7649 articles screened, 25 met criteria, and 21 were included in meta-analysis. Interventions primarily focused on diet and exercise, with several also incorporating psychological support, alcohol abstinence, or weight management. Studies mainly targeted breast and prostate cancer survivors, with varied cardiometabolic outcomes. CLIs demonstrated greater improvements in body mass index (n = 16, SMD = −0.27, 95% CI = −0.38 to −0.15, P < 0.001), fasting blood glucose (n = 12, SMD = −0.29, 95% CI = −0.54 to −0.04, P = 0.021), low-density lipoprotein (n = 8, SMD = −0.15, 95% CI = −0.30 to −0.01, P = 0.039), diastolic blood pressure (n = 10, SMD = −0.12, 95% CI = −0.20 to −0.04, P = 0.003), and triglycerides (n = 10, SMD = −0.26, 95% CI = −0.43 to −0.08, P = 0.004). Subgroup analyses showed limited differences across intervention types, except for effects on fasting blood glucose levels. Conclusions CLIs are associated with modest but statistically significant improvements in cardiometabolic risk management among cancer survivors. Further studies may prioritize more consistent frameworks for defining CLIs, while incorporating digital health technologies and evidence-based behavior change strategies to enhance intervention effectiveness and sustainability. Review registration Registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251013007).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in cancer survivors. Combined lifestyle interventions (CLIs) was evaluated on body mass index (SMD -0.27, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.15, p=<0.001). Combined lifestyle interventions in cancer survivors improved body mass index, fasting blood glucose, LDL, diastolic BP, and triglycerides.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: