Key result
Clinic nurse involvement in pediatric BP measurement increased ~109% since 1997, but fewer address diastolic hypertension.
Why the study?
A 1997 survey identified a lack of BP measurement standardisation and little consensus on diagnosing hypertension among paediatricians, prompting a repeat survey to compare clinical practice between time periods.
Cross-Sectional (n=125)
Yes
Absolute Event Rate: 84.8% vs 40.6%
Over 20 years, pediatric BP assessment has seen increased nurse involvement and technology use, but a concerning decrease in the use of diastolic BP for diagnosing hypertension.
Fewer paediatricians now factor diastolic BP into hypertension diagnosis; leaves open whether this reflects guideline shifts or requires targeted education.
In 1997 a survey identified a general lack of standardisation of blood pressure (BP) measurement and little consensus on the criteria for diagnosing hypertension amongst paediatricians. We have conducted a new online survey in 2021, to compare clinical practice between the two time periods. A national quality improvement survey was approved by the GAPRUKI committee and then circulated to consultant-grade general paediatricians. 125 analysable replies from 34 different sites were received and compared with the 1997 data. 106 (84.8%) reported clinic nurse involvement in BP measurement, more than twice than reported previously (40.6%). Most paediatricians (53.6%) now rely on oscillometric devices, whereas the mercury sphygmomanometer was favoured previously (82.7%). If assessing BP manually ( n = 89), most (79.8%) now use Korotkoff phase V as the auscultatory endpoint for diastolic BP (phase IV was previously used (52.1%)). Diagnostic criteria of hypertension, the criteria (≥95 th centile for gender, age and height) were constant, and 100% of paediatricians diagnosed it using systolic BP, but only 43 (34.4%) used diastolic BP, a decrease from 79.4% previously. Ambulatory BP Monitoring was six times more available than in 1997 (81.6% vs 13.6%). Similar to previous findings, only 12 (9.6%) paediatricians would manage hypertensive patients themselves, however 82 (72.6%) would keep general paediatric input. There have been important changes in the assessment of BP in children, including increased nurse involvement and greater use of technology. However, fewer paediatricians are responding to high diastolic pressures than twenty years ago.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jones et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension in children and adolescents (n=125). Clinical practice in 2021 vs. Clinical practice in 1997 was evaluated on Clinic nurse involvement in blood pressure measurement. Compared to 1997, paediatricians in 2021 reported increased clinic nurse involvement in blood pressure measurement (84.8% vs 40.6%) and greater use of oscillometric devices, but fewer responded to high diastolic pressures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: