Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study estimates health-risk-induced egress delays in stadium stands, suggesting design improvements.
Stadium stands combine high occupant density, steep seating geometry, and constrained egress routes, yet design-stage egress calculations usually represent spectators through aggregate flow rates and do not explicitly account for health-related stair-use tolerance. This study proposes a reproducible queue-based workflow for estimating health-risk-induced egress delay in independent stadium-stand units and for supporting early-stage design screening. A deterministic capacity–flow baseline is first computed for each stand and translated into an auditable GraphML queue network. A Nursing-Based Health Score (NBHS), derived from riser height, tread depth, and stair pitch, is used as a geometry-based tolerance proxy rather than a clinical diagnostic score. NBHS risk is then propagated through vulnerable-profile headway multipliers at constrained gangway-to-vomitory bottleneck edges, and stand-level delay is estimated using grouped Monte Carlo queue processing. The queue baseline remained close to the deterministic reference (mean Tqueue0/Tdet = 0.980), supporting interpretation of subsequent delays as controlled perturbations. Delay increased monotonically with headway sensitivity, and stand-level variation was explained by GraphML-derived bottleneck service-rate properties. These findings provide a practical design-stage reference for identifying stand configurations where stair geometry and egress bottleneck capacity jointly amplify delay for vulnerable spectators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurumak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: