Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals optimal stimulation techniques for neuromodulation in visual pathways, indicating new strategies for vision restoration.
Brain‐machine interfaces (BMIs) for vision restoration require models that accurately simulate the anatomy and electrical properties of visual pathways. However, current models focus only on isolated structures, such as the retina or brain, and overlook surrounding tissues. Here, we present a comprehensive computational model of the human head that incorporates the entire visual pathway—including the eye, optic nerve, and brain—along with critical neighboring tissues such as the orbit and paranasal sinuses, thereby enabling precise simulations. Validation using human and large‐animal data shows a strong correlation between the simulated and measured electric potentials. Component‐elimination analysis reveals that the optimized comprehensive model outperforms simplified versions. The model demonstrates its utility in multiple applications: (1) comparative analysis of electrical neuromodulation technologies for optic neuropathy, revealing the electric field intensity limitations of noninvasive approaches and the safety concerns of invasive intraorbital approaches; (2) identification of the optimal stimulation site, showing that transnasal stimulation at the optic chiasm outperforms traditional approaches; and (3) in silico design of electrode arrays for optic nerve prostheses, demonstrating theoretical advantages in invasiveness and visual field coverage compared to existing retinal and cortical prosthetics. This validated and versatile computational resource supports the development of neuromodulation strategies and visual BMI technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
lu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: