Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates a new forecasting framework for airport delays, highlighting the benefit of graph-based models.
Existing airport delay prediction models often focus on isolated flight-level or airport-level forecasts and do not explicitly represent the spatial propagation of disruptions across a national air transportation network. This study develops and evaluates a spatio-temporal graph learning framework for multi-horizon airport-level delay forecasting in the U.S. domestic network. Using 2,878,854 flight records from January 2019 to August 2023, flights are aggregated into hourly node-time tensors over 370 airports and 5334 directed connections. The proposed framework combines graph-based airport connectivity, temporal delay persistence, rare-disruption detection, and conformal uncertainty estimation over a 1–3 h forecasting horizon. The results show that LSTM attains the lowest aligned point-forecast errors, while ST-GCN provides competitive multi-horizon performance with substantially lower parameter complexity and explicit graph-aware outputs; the direct XGBoost baselines provide nonlinear tabular benchmarks but do not dominate the final multi-horizon evaluation. These findings indicate that graph-based models are most useful not as universal point-forecast winners but as interpretable network-aware tools for monitoring delay propagation, disruption risk, and operational uncertainty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: