Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights the benefits of co-interviewing in research focused on mental health medication for those with learning disabilities, suggesting a more equitable approach.
Background Co‐production in research entails researchers, practitioners and the public working together on a project, sharing decision making, responsibility and ownership of a project and its outcomes. This paper reflects on the process of university researchers and researchers with learning disabilities working together on an inclusive research project about supporting people with learning disabilities to make decisions about mental health medication. Method This paper explores the inclusive approach taken to design and conduct interviews. Findings Researchers with learning disabilities brought a unique perspective to the project due to their lived experience, which resulted in benefits for the whole research team as well as research participants. Interview materials were relevant and accessible and there was often common ground, increased trust and a strong rapport with interview participants with learning disabilities. The co‐interviewing approach with health professionals appeared to increase reflection on working practices. Conclusions Co‐interviewing can be a more inclusive, equitable interview approach, leading to more relevant, meaningful and impactful research outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cavanagh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: