Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research investigates the alignment between deep ecology principles and ancient Indian religions, suggesting ethical frameworks for ecology.
This research paper investigates the conceptual alignment between Arne Naess’s modern environmental philosophy of “Deep Ecology” and the ecospiritual tenets of ancient Indian religions, specifically Hinduism, Jainism, and Buddhism. Amidst mounting global environmental crises, the study examines how Naess’s core principles—such as Ecosophy, Biospheric Egalitarianism, Intrinsic Value, and Symbiosis—closely resonate with ancient Eastern worldviews. Textual analysis reveals that the Vedic invocations for cosmic peace, the Upanishadic narrative of interconnected creation, the Buddhist concepts of Pratītyasamutpāda (dependent origination) and Śūnyatā, and the foundational Jain aphorism Parasparopagraho Jīvānām (mutual interdependence) collectively mirror the modern science of ecology. Furthermore, Naess’s notion of ‘Selfrealization’ draws direct inspiration from Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy of nonviolence rooted in the essential oneness of life. Ultimately, the paper underscores the contemporary relevance of integrating these traditional moral and scriptural frameworks into modern education and interfaith initiatives to foster global ecological harmony.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malvika Ranjan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: