Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates enhanced ontology construction performance using automated reinforcement learning methods, indicating significant advancements in knowledge engineering.
Conceptual ontology construction, a foundational knowledge engineering task, is constrained by traditional methods’ heavy manual reliance and poor complex-domain adaptability. This study proposes the AOCG-LLM+ framework for fully automated conceptual ontology construction, integrating reinforcement learning with human feedback and a dynamically adjusted radius hierarchical clustering algorithm. Three experiments validated the framework via an LLM-calibrated evaluation system combining quantitative metrics and subjective criteria. Results show AOCG-LLM+ outperforms baselines: the RLHF-driven entity-relation extraction module achieves 92.5% entity precision (10.1% points above plain LLMs) and 88.3% relation F1-score (13 points above BERT+GCN), with 20% higher entity recall than shallow statistical learning-based techniques. The clustering algorithm attains state-of-the-art metrics, achieving superior performance on all clustering metrics. Subjective evaluation demonstrates the framework’s universality across different LLMs. This work verifies AOCG-LLM+’s technical advantages, addresses traditional methods’ hierarchical rationality and consistency defects, and provides a reliable fully automated conceptual ontology construction solution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: