Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Philosophical paper outlines self-knowledge mechanisms in rational minds, highlighting implicit and explicit understanding.
This paper articulates and defends a constitutivist account of self-knowledge for rational minds. It is a built-in feature of such states in rational human animals that they are always potentially self-conscious and so potentially self-knowable in explicit reflective consciousness. But independently of whether one explicitly reflects on some mental state or other, such states are always implicitly or unreflectively known. For a rational mind to undergo a mental state is to undergo an essentially knowable condition, because rational minds are self-consciously constituted. In Section 2, I explicate constitutivism by laying out its main philosophical commitments. In Section 3, I elaborate the crucial role of implicit self-knowledge in a constitutive account (as a ‘built-in’ feature of mental states) by critically engaging with Matthew Boyle’s recent account of reflective self-knowledge and pre-reflective self-awareness. In Section 4, I address the worry that a constitutivist account of self-knowledge must have a restricted scope because it cannot explain knowledge of phenomenal states.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Evan Jones (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: