Key result
Structured nurse-led follow-up linked to better clinical stability, adherence, and self-care versus usual care.
Why the study?
Evidence integrating clinical effectiveness and economic efficiency for structured nurse-led follow-up programmes in heart failure, particularly in Advanced Practice Nursing, remains limited.
Does a structured nurse-led follow-up programme improve clinical outcomes and healthcare efficiency in adult patients with heart failure after hospital discharge compared to usual care?
Does a structured nurse-led follow-up programme improve clinical outcomes and healthcare efficiency in adult patients with heart failure after hospital discharge compared to usual care?
A structured nurse-led follow-up program for complex heart failure patients may improve clinical stability, self-care, and healthcare resource utilization compared to usual care.
May support nurse-led HF follow-up post-discharge; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Background Heart failure is a chronic condition with high prevalence, associated with significant morbidity and mortality, frequent hospital readmissions and substantial healthcare resource consumption. Structured nurse-led follow-up programmes have demonstrated improvements in clinical outcomes; however, evidence integrating both clinical effectiveness and economic efficiency, particularly in the context of Advanced Practice Nursing, remains limited. Aim To evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of a structured nurse-led follow-up programme in patients with heart failure after hospital discharge, compared with usual care. Methods A multicentre, prospective, longitudinal, quasi-experimental study was conducted. Adult patients (≥18 years) with heart failure (HFrEF or NYHA III–IV), at least two previous hospital admissions and an identified primary caregiver were included. The intervention group received structured follow-up led by specialised cardiac nurses, including comprehensive clinical assessment, therapeutic education, treatment optimisation, early detection of decompensation and direct telephone access. The control group received usual follow-up by cardiology and primary care. The follow-up period was 12 months. Clinical variables, self-care behaviours, quality of life and healthcare costs were analysed. Results Preliminary analysis (June–October 2025) included 49 patients, with a mean age of 70.7 years, predominance of men (79.6%), a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 31.2% and a high level of polypharmacy (mean 8.4 drugs per patient). Most patients were classified as NYHA functional class II–III. Early findings suggest improvements in clinical stability, treatment adherence and self-care, together with a reduction in potentially avoidable hospitalisations and a more efficient use of healthcare resources. Conclusions These preliminary results support the role of structured nurse-led follow-up as an effective and potentially efficient strategy for the comprehensive management of complex patients with heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rico et al. (2026) studied heart failure (n=49). structured nurse-led follow-up programme vs. usual follow-up by cardiology and primary care was evaluated on Clinical variables, self-care behaviours, quality of life and healthcare costs. Preliminary analysis of 49 patients suggests a structured nurse-led follow-up programme improves clinical stability, treatment adherence, and self-care compared to usual care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: