Key result
Finger-toe pulse transit time calculated using the maximum of the second derivative algorithm and optimized signal processing strongly correlated with carotid-femoral measurements (r=0.81, P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does finger-toe pulse wave velocity (ft-PWV) accurately correlate with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) for measuring arterial stiffness?
Observational (n=167)
Does finger-toe pulse wave velocity (ft-PWV) accurately correlate with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) for measuring arterial stiffness?
Finger-toe pulse wave velocity using the maximum of the second derivative algorithm provides a promising, simple, noninvasive alternative to carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity for assessing aortic stiffness.
May support simpler stiffness assessment; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) (cf-PWV) is the gold standard for measuring aortic stiffness. Finger-toe PWV (ft-PWV) is a simpler noninvasive method for measuring arterial stiffness. Although the validity of the method has been previously assessed, its accuracy can be improved. ft-PWV is determined on the basis of a patented height chart for the distance and the pulse transit time (PTT) between the finger and the toe pulpar arteries signals (ft-PTT). METHOD: The objective of the first study, performed in 66 patients, was to compare different algorithms (intersecting tangents, maximum of the second derivative, 10% threshold and cross-correlation) for determining the foot of the arterial pulse wave, thus the ft-PTT. The objective of the second study, performed in 101 patients, was to investigate different signal processing chains to improve the concordance of ft-PWV with the gold-standard cf-PWV. Finger-toe PWV (ft-PWV) was calculated using the four algorithms. RESULTS: The best correlations relating ft-PWV and cf-PWV, and relating ft-PTT and carotid-femoral PTT were obtained with the maximum of the second derivative algorithm [PWV: r = 0.56, P < 0.0001, root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.9 m/s; PTT: r = 0.61, P < 0.001, RMSE = 12 ms]. The three other algorithms showed lower correlations. The correlation between ft-PTT and carotid-femoral PTT further improved (r = 0.81, P < 0.0001, RMSE = 5.4 ms) when the maximum of the second derivative algorithm was combined with an optimized signal processing chain. CONCLUSION: Selecting the maximum of the second derivative algorithm for detecting the foot of the pressure waveform, and combining it with an optimized signal processing chain, improved the accuracy of ft-PWV measurement in the current population sample. Thus, it makes ft-PWV very promising for the simple noninvasive determination of aortic stiffness in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Obeid et al. (2017) reported an observational. Finger-toe pulse wave velocity (ft-PWV) using the maximum of the second derivative algorithm vs. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) was evaluated on Correlation between finger-toe and carotid-femoral pulse transit time (PTT) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) (r = 0.81, p=<0.0001). Finger-toe pulse transit time calculated using the maximum of the second derivative algorithm and optimized signal processing strongly correlated with carotid-femoral measurements (r=0.81, P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: