Key result
Periodontal treatment improves surrogate cardiovascular markers but lacks RCT evidence for clinical outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cardiovascular diseases are the worldwide leading cause of mortality. Cardiovascular diseases are noncommunicable conditions with a complex pathogenesis, and their clinical manifestations include major cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction and stroke. Epidemiologic evidence suggests a consistent association between periodontitis and increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. Some evidence supports a beneficial effect of the treatment of periodontitis on both surrogate and hard cardiovascular outcomes. This narrative review has been conducted as an update of the most recent evidence on the effects of periodontitis treatment on cardiovascular outcomes since the last commissioned review of the European Federation of Periodontology-American Academy of Periodontology World Workshop in 2012. Newer evidence originating from published randomized controlled trials confirms a positive effect of periodontal treatment on surrogate measures of cardiovascular diseases, whereas there have been no randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of periodontal treatment on the incidence of cardiovascular disease events such as myocardial infarction and stroke. In conclusion, there is sufficient evidence from observational and experimental studies on surrogate cardiovascular measures to justify the design and conduct of appropriately powered randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of effective periodontal interventions on cardiovascular disease outcomes (ie, myocardial infarction and stroke) with adequate control of traditional cardiovascular risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orlandi et al. (2020) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease and periodontitis. Periodontal therapy was evaluated. Periodontal treatment shows a positive effect on surrogate cardiovascular measures, but no randomized controlled trials have investigated its effect on hard clinical outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: