Key result
Continuous vital sign monitoring in healthcare-at-home patients generated between 65 and 3113 total alarms depending on observation frequency and median filter window size.
Why the study?
Continuous vital sign monitoring with wearables in healthcare at home increases assessment frequency but can cause information overload for clinicians.
How do vital sign observation frequency and alarm settings impact alarm rates and detection time in patients admitted to healthcare at home programs?
Observational (n=76)
How do vital sign observation frequency and alarm settings impact alarm rates and detection time in patients admitted to healthcare at home programs?
Optimizing alarm settings and median filter windows in continuous remote monitoring can reduce nuisance alarms while maintaining early detection of clinical deterioration.
Observation frequency and alarm settings shape alarm burden in home monitoring; hypothesis-generating for optimized thresholds before clinical scaling.
The importance of vital sign monitoring to detect deterioration increases during healthcare at home. Continuous monitoring with wearables increases assessment frequency but may create information overload for clinicians. The goal of this work was to demonstrate the impact of vital sign observation frequency and alarm settings on alarms in a real-world dataset. Vital signs were collected from 76 patients admitted to healthcare at home programs using the Current Health (CH) platform; its wearable continuously measured respiratory rate (RR), pulse rate (PR), and oxygen saturation (SpO2). Total alarms, alarm rate, patient rate, and detection time were calculated for three alarm rulesets to detect changes in SpO2, PR, and RR under four vital sign observation frequencies and four window sizes for the alarm algorithms’ median filter. Total alarms ranged from 65 to 3113. The alarm rate and early detection increased with the observation frequency for all alarm rulesets. Median filter windows reduced alarms triggered by normal fluctuations in vital signs without compromising the granularity of time between assessments. Frequent assessments enabled with continuous monitoring support early intervention but need to pair with settings that balance sensitivity, specificity, clinical risk, and provider capacity to respond when a patient is home to minimize clinician burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zahradka et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Healthcare at home (n=76). Vital sign observation frequency and alarm settings was evaluated on Total alarms, alarm rate, patient rate, and detection time. Continuous vital sign monitoring in healthcare-at-home patients generated between 65 and 3113 total alarms depending on observation frequency and median filter window size.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: