Controlled-release paroxetine significantly improved HAM-D scores compared to placebo in elderly patients with major depressive disorder (adjusted difference -2.6; 95% CI -4.47 to -0.73; p=0.007).
RCT (n=319)
double-blind
randomized
Yes
Does paroxetine (controlled-release or immediate-release) improve depressive symptoms in elderly patients with major depressive disorder?
Both controlled-release and immediate-release paroxetine are effective and well-tolerated treatments for major depressive disorder in elderly patients.
Mean Difference: -2.6 (95% CI -4.47–-0.73)
Absolute Event Rate: 10% vs 12.6%
p-value: p=0.007
BACKGROUND: Depression is the second most common neuropsychiatric disorder in older Americans, with significant clinical and public health costs. Despite advances in treatment, late-life depression remains a clinical challenge. Although the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the most common pharmacologic intervention for late-life depression, few placebo-controlled trials have assessed the efficacy of SSRIs for this condition. METHOD: In this 12-week, multicenter, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose, double-blind, randomized trial, 319 elderly patients (mean age = 70 years) were treated with controlled-release paroxetine (paroxetine CR) up to 50 mg/day (N = 104), immediate-release paroxetine (paroxetine IR) up to 40 mg/day (N = 106), or placebo (N = 109). Patients met DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder and had a total score of 18 or more on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline to endpoint in HAM-D total score. RESULTS: The primary efficacy analysis showed an adjusted difference between change from baseline in HAM-D score for paroxetine CR and placebo of -2.6 (95% confidence interval CI = -4.47 to -0.73, p = .007) at the week 12 last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) endpoint. The adjusted difference between paroxetine IR and placebo was -2.8 (95% CI = -4.65 to -0.99, p = .003) at week 12. Paroxetine CR and IR were more effective than placebo, with mean +/- SD endpoint HAM-D total scores of 10.0 +/- 7.41 and 10.0 +/- 7.10, respectively, for the active treatments compared with 12.6 +/- 7.34 for placebo. Response, defined as a score of 1 or 2 on the Clinical Global Impressions-global improvement scale, was achieved by 72% of paroxetine CR patients (LOCF; p 2 years) and those with short-term (< or = 2 years) depression. Dropout rates due to adverse events were 12.5% for paroxetine CR, 16.0% for paroxetine IR, and 8.3% for placebo. CONCLUSION: Paroxetine CR and paroxetine IR are effective and well tolerated treatments for major depressive disorder in elderly patients, including those with chronic depression.
Rapaport et al. (Mon,) conducted a rct in major depressive disorder (n=319). Controlled-release paroxetine (paroxetine CR) vs. Placebo was evaluated on change from baseline to endpoint in HAM-D total score (MD -2.6, 95% CI -4.47 to -0.73, p=0.007). Controlled-release paroxetine significantly improved HAM-D scores compared to placebo in elderly patients with major depressive disorder (adjusted difference -2.6; 95% CI -4.47 to -0.73; p=0.007).