Why the study?
Does paroxetine compared to fluoxetine improve mood and cognitive functions in depressed nondemented elderly patients?
Does paroxetine compared to fluoxetine improve mood and cognitive functions in depressed nondemented elderly patients?
Both paroxetine and fluoxetine are effective and safe for long-term treatment of depression in the elderly without causing cognitive decline.
Supports long-term SSRI use in elderly depression; extends short-term trial data by confirming sustained efficacy and cognitive stability.
BACKGROUND: A large proportion of the elderly population complains of depressive symptoms. The ideal antidepressant for these patients, who often suffer from numerous concomitant diseases, should not worsen their cognitive functions and should be free of contraindications. METHOD: To assess the effects of 2 selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on cognitive functions in elderly depressed patients (ICD-10 criteria), we conducted a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study comparing paroxetine (20-40 mg daily) and fluoxetine (20-60 mg daily) treatment for 1 year. Cognitive performance was evaluated by means of the Buschke Selective Reminding Test, the Blessed Information and Memory Test, the Clifton Assessment Schedule, the Cancellation Task Test, and the Wechsler Paired Word Test; the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Clinical Anxiety Scale were administered to assess the course of depressive and anxiety symptoms, respectively. RESULTS: 242 patients were enrolled (mean +/- SD age = 75.4 +/- 6.6 years). During the study, no deterioration of cognition was observed; on the contrary, most of the tested cognitive functions improved. Good antidepressant efficacy was maintained for over 1 year with both drugs, based on the percentage of responders to treatment (patients achieving a HAM-D total score < 10; 60%). Both drugs showed a good tolerability and safety profile. CONCLUSION: The 2 antidepressants proved to be suitable for the long-term treatment of depression in the elderly and to be devoid of detrimental effects on the tested cognitive functions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cassano et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: