Key result
This study is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate Chinese patent medicine capsules for recurrent angina pectoris after PCI, and contains no results.
Why the study?
The efficacy of various western medicines for recurrent angina pectoris after PCI has not been fully confirmed, while Chinese patent medicine capsules are generally used.
Does Chinese patent medicine capsules (CPMC) improve major adverse cardiovascular events and angina attack frequency in patients with recurrent stable angina pectoris after PCI?
Systematic Review
Does Chinese patent medicine capsules (CPMC) improve major adverse cardiovascular events and angina attack frequency in patients with recurrent stable angina pectoris after PCI?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chinese patent medicine capsules for recurrent stable angina after PCI.
INTRODUCTION: Recurrent angina pectoris after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common clinical syndrome, which seriously reduces the quality of life and health of patients, increases medical costs, and causes the risk of cardiogenic death. The efficacy of various western medicine improving angina symptoms has not been fully confirmed at the moment, whereas Chinese patent medicine capsules (CPMC) have been generally used in clinical practice due to the therapeutic efficacy and safety. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of CPMC for stable angina after PCI, designed to provide more evidence for clinical treatment. METHODS: This protocol was based on the previous reporting items. We will search 3 English databases (PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database, and the Cochrane Library) and 3 Chinese databases (China Network Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang Database, and Chinese Biomedicine) until January 2020. RCTs to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CPMC for recurrent stable angina pectoris after PCI will be included. The primary outcome will be assessed by major adverse cardiovascular events and angina attack frequency. We will use the criteria provided by Cochrane risk of bias tool for quality evaluation and risk assessment, and use the Revman 5.3 for meta-analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for systematic review and meta-analysis. The results of this review will be disseminated in a peer-review journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020164005.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review in Recurrent stable angina pectoris after percutaneous coronary intervention. Chinese patent medicine capsules was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events and angina attack frequency. This study is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate Chinese patent medicine capsules for recurrent angina pectoris after PCI, and contains no results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: