Key result
Guided de-escalation of DAPT showed similar 1-year primary endpoint rates compared to control in both men (7.0% vs 9.0%; HR 0.78) and women (8.4% vs 9.2%; HR 0.92), with no gender interaction.
Why the study?
Guided de-escalation of DAPT was recently identified as an effective alternative strategy in ACS, but the impact of gender on clinical outcomes and platelet reactivity remained to be assessed.
Does guided de-escalation of DAPT improve clinical outcomes equally in male and female patients with acute coronary syndrome?
RCT (n=2,610)
Does guided de-escalation of DAPT improve clinical outcomes equally in male and female patients with acute coronary syndrome?
p-value: p int = 0.60
Guided de-escalation of DAPT in ACS patients appears to be equally safe and effective in both men and women, with no significant gender interaction for ischemic or bleeding outcomes.
Supports similar outcomes with guided DAPT de-escalation across sexes in ACS; hypothesis-generating, requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Objectives This prespecified analysis of the TROPICAL-ACS trial aimed to assess the impact of gender on clinical outcomes and platelet reactivity (PR) following guided de-escalation of dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Background Guided de-escalation of DAPT was recently identified as an effective alternative treatment strategy in ACS. Methods We used Cox proportional hazards models and linear regression analysis to assess the interaction of gender with clinical endpoints and PR. Results In both male (n = 2,052) and female (n = 558) patients, the 1-year incidence of the primary endpoint did not differ in guided de-escalation versus control group patients (male: 7.0% vs. 9.0%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57–1.06, p = 0.11; female: 8.4% vs. 9.2%; HR, 0.92, 95% CI, 0.53–1.62, p = 0.76, p int = 0.60). The 1-year incidence of combined ischemic events (male: 2.5% vs. 3.3%; HR, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.46–1.26, p = 0.29; female: 2.2% vs. 2.8%; HR, 0.78,95% CI, 0.27–2.25, p = 0.65, p int = 0.96) as well as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ≥ 2 bleeding (male: 4.6% vs. 6.0%; HR, 0.77, 95% CI, 0.52–1.12, p = 0.17; female: 6.2% vs. 6.4%; HR, 0.99, 95% CI, 0.51–1.92, p = 0.97, p int = 0.51) was similar in the guided de-escalation versus control group for both male and female patients. Interaction testing revealed no significant impact of gender on PR levels (prasugrel or clopidogrel) across treatment groups (p int = 0.72). Conclusion Guided de-escalation of DAPT appears to be equally safe and effective in women and men. Especially in patients with increased bleeding risk and independent from gender, a guided DAPT de-escalation strategy may be used as an alternative treatment strategy. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https//www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT: 01959451.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Groß et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n=2,610). Guided de-escalation of dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) vs. Control group was evaluated on 1-year incidence of the primary endpoint (p=p int = 0.60). Guided de-escalation of DAPT showed similar 1-year primary endpoint rates compared to control in both men (7.0% vs 9.0%; HR 0.78) and women (8.4% vs 9.2%; HR 0.92), with no gender interaction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: