Key result
Corticosteroid therapy showed no evidence of beneficial or adverse effects on death or poor outcome in patients with SAH or PICH, with wide confidence intervals precluding definitive conclusions.
Why the study?
Does corticosteroid therapy reduce death or poor outcome in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage or primary intracerebral haemorrhage?
Population
462 patients of any age and either gender with clinically diagnosed primary intracerebral haemorrhage or…
Comparison
Corticosteroid therapy vs Placebo or standard strategy arm
Design
Meta-analysis, Randomised or quasi-randomised clinical trials
Follow-up
1 to 6 months
Authors
Loading...
Insufficient evidence precludes routine corticosteroid use in SAH or PICH; larger trials needed to resolve uncertainty.
Systematic Review (n=462)
Does corticosteroid therapy reduce death or poor outcome in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage or primary intracerebral haemorrhage?
There is currently insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of corticosteroids for improving outcomes in patients with subarachnoid or primary intracerebral hemorrhage.
Feigin et al. (2005) conducted a systematic review in Subarachnoid haemorrhage and primary intracerebral haemorrhage (n=462). Corticosteroids vs. Placebo or standard strategy was evaluated on Death and poor outcome (death, severe disability, or vegetative state) within the first 1 to 6 months. Corticosteroid therapy showed no evidence of beneficial or adverse effects on death or poor outcome in patients with SAH or PICH, with wide confidence intervals precluding definitive conclusions.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: