Key result
Apical tether fixation for TMVR resulted in a significantly smaller reduction of the neo-LVOT diameter compared to annular fixation (26% vs 60%, p<0.001) in an experimental setting.
Why the study?
The study evaluated the impact of two different TMVR fixation strategies on neo-LVOT and aorto-mitral angulation.
Does an apical tether fixation TMVR system improve neo-LVOT and aorto-mitral angulation compared to an annular fixation system in an experimental setting?
Does an apical tether fixation TMVR system improve neo-LVOT and aorto-mitral angulation compared to an annular fixation system in an experimental setting?
Absolute Event Rate: 26% vs 60%
p-value: p=<0.001
In an experimental setting, an apical tether fixation system for TMVR maintained a larger neo-LVOT and more stable aorto-mitral angulation compared to an annular fixation system, potentially reducing the risk of neo-LVOT obstruction.
Apical tether fixation may lower LVOT obstruction risk in TMVR; leaves open translation to clinical device selection.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of two different transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) fixation strategies on the neo left ventricular outflow tract (neo-LVOT) and aorto-mitral angulation (AMA) after TMVR. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two different self-expanding nitinol valved stents were developed for transapical TMVR. In one group, the stents were fixed with an annular fixation system (ANN group, n=6). These prototypes were compared with an apical tether fixation TMVR system (AP group, n=11) in another group. Echocardiographic evaluation of the AMA and the neo-LVOT was conducted before and one hour after implantation. Maximal and minimal AMA (AMAmax and AMAmin) during the cardiac cycle of the AP group were significantly narrower than those of the ANN group (AMAmax: 39±8° vs 67±15°, p<0.001, AMAmin: 33±10° vs 56±22°, p=0.009). More severe reduction of the neo-LVOT diameter was observed in the ANN group (60±11% vs 26±14%, p<0.001). The ANN group had a higher peak velocity through the neo-LVOT post implantation (200±52 cm/s vs 108±15 cm/s, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The apical fixation system maintains a smaller and more stable aorto-mitral angulation and a larger neo-LVOT, thereby reducing the risk of postoperative neo-LVOT obstruction in this experimental setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lutter et al. (2020) studied Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) (n=17). Apical tether fixation TMVR system vs. Annular fixation TMVR system was evaluated on Reduction of the neo-LVOT diameter (p=<0.001). Apical tether fixation for TMVR resulted in a significantly smaller reduction of the neo-LVOT diameter compared to annular fixation (26% vs 60%, p<0.001) in an experimental setting.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: