Key result
Substituting eGFR for eCrCl causes ~45% DOAC dosing disagreement in AF with renal impairment.
Why the study?
DOAC dosing approved via Cockcroft-Gault eCrCl may conflict with other renal equations used in practice, and real-world dosing patterns in resource-limited countries remain underreported.
Does using eGFR instead of eCrCl lead to DOAC dosing discrepancies in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation and kidney impairment?
Cross-Sectional (n=326)
No
Does using eGFR instead of eCrCl lead to DOAC dosing discrepancies in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation and kidney impairment?
Using eGFR instead of eCrCl for DOAC dose adjustments can result in significant dosing discordance, primarily overdosing, especially in patients with eGFR less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m2.
Substituting eGFR for eCrCl may cause inappropriate DOAC dosing in AF with kidney impairment; hypothesis-generating for prospective outcome studies.
The Thai Food and Drug Administration (TFDA) has approved direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dosing based on estimated creatinine clearance, eCrCl (Cockcroft‐Gault equation). However, other renal function equations are often used in practice for patients with kidney disease, leading to potential discrepancies in DOAC dosing recommendations. The actual DOAC dosing patterns in resource‐limited countries remain underreported. This cross‐sectional study included patients with renal impairment who were treated at the outpatient department of Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand. Patients received their first DOAC for atrial fibrillation from January 2019 to December 2022. The primary objective was to evaluate the percentage of DOAC prescriptions compliant with TFDA guidelines using eCrCl. We also examined dosing agreement when substituting estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR (CKD‐EPI) for eCrCl. Patient factors and the incidence of stroke and bleeding over a one‐year follow‐up were also assessed. A total of 326 patients and 1587 DOAC prescriptions were analyzed. The mean patient age was 79.1 ± 9.2 years, with a mean eGFR of 45.6 ± 9.9 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . TFDA‐compliant dosing was observed in 68.2% of prescriptions. Dose disagreement between eGFR and eCrCl was 45%, with a trend toward overdosing using eGFR. An eGFR of less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 was associated with dose discrepancies. Stroke and bleeding incidences were low, with no differences across DOAC types. While most Thai patients received appropriate DOAC dosing, one‐third did not comply with TFDA guidelines. Using eGFR instead of eCrCl may result in dosing differences, particularly in moderate to severe renal impairment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sukkha et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial fibrillation with kidney impairment (n=326). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was evaluated on Percentage of DOAC prescriptions compliant with TFDA guidelines using eCrCl. In Thai patients with atrial fibrillation and kidney impairment, 68.2% of DOAC prescriptions complied with TFDA dosing guidelines, with a 45% dose disagreement when substituting eGFR for eCrCl.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: