Why the study?
Does using CKD-EPI or MDRD formulas instead of the Cockcroft-Gault formula for DOAC dosing adjustment affect thromboembolic and bleeding complications in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does using CKD-EPI or MDRD formulas instead of the Cockcroft-Gault formula for DOAC dosing adjustment affect thromboembolic and bleeding complications in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.1% vs 0.8%
p-value: p=0.01
Reclassifying DOAC renal dosing using CKD-EPI instead of Cockcroft-Gault in AF patients may lead to inappropriate dose adjustments and significantly higher thromboembolic events.
Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, Rohla et al 1 raise concerns regarding the current practice of basing renal dosing adjustments for direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl). 1 Using registry data for patients with AF, they estimated CrCl using the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formulas; they compared thromboembolic and bleeding complications between patients with dissimilar renal dosing indications using the 3 formulas based on prescribing information in Europe. Nearly 40% of patients would have required dosage adjustment using either the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease or CKD-EPI formulas instead of CG. Importantly, thromboembolic events were 5-fold higher in patients whose DOAC dose would have been adjusted based on reclassification using the CKD-EPI formula compared with the CG formula (4.1% versus 0.8%, P=0.01). Major bleeding events were also numerically greater in patients who were reclassified using the CKD-EPI formula (5.7% versus 2.7%, P=0.09), but the difference was not statistically significant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2021) conducted an editorial in Atrial fibrillation. DOAC dose adjustment based on CKD-EPI formula vs. DOAC dose adjustment based on Cockcroft-Gault formula was evaluated on Thromboembolic events (p=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: