Key result
Inappropriate DOAC dosing was associated with increased rates of ischemic stroke (9.9% vs 3.1%, P<0.01) and major bleeding (11.7% vs 6.0%, P=0.04) compared to appropriate dosing.
Why the study?
DOACs have proven efficacy to prevent cardioembolic strokes, but data on the appropriateness of DOAC dosing in the Middle East are scarce.
Does inappropriate DOAC dosing increase the risk of stroke and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cross-Sectional (n=608)
No
Does inappropriate DOAC dosing increase the risk of stroke and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 9.9% vs 3.1%
p-value: p=<0.01
Inappropriate DOAC dosing is common in the Middle East Gulf Region and is significantly associated with increased risks of both ischemic stroke and major bleeding.
Inappropriate dosing may warrant audits in Gulf patients; leaves open whether optimization reduces events in prospective trials.
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have proven efficacy to prevent cardioembolic strokes. Data are scarce about the appropriateness of DOAC dosing in the Middle East. We investigated the prevalence of inappropriate DOAC dosing in the region. A cross-sectional study was conducted at our hospital between April 2015 and February 2019 of patients receiving 1 of the 3 available DOACs. Patients with incomplete data sets, those prescribed DOACs for indications other than atrial fibrillation, on DOACs for <30 days, and dialysis patients were excluded. A total of 608 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 65.2 ± 13.9 years, and most were men (58.6%). The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.8 ± 2.0. There were 346 (56.9%) on apixaban, 123 (20.2%) on dabigatran, and 139 (22.9%) on rivaroxaban. The logistic regression model showed that for the 3 agents together, age, eGFR, major bleeding history, and history of prior stroke were significantly associated with the decision to inappropriately underdose (P < 0.05). Fifteen patients had an ischemic stroke after apixaban initiation (5 underdosed and 3 overdosed). Among patients with at least one follow-up encounter, major bleeding occurred in 13 patients (11.7%) with inappropriate dosing compared with 29 patients (6.0%) with appropriate dosing (P = 0.04). Ischemic stroke occurred in 11 patients (9.9%) with inappropriate dosing compared with 15 patients (3.1%) with appropriate dosing (P < 0.01). We concluded that inappropriate DOAC underdosing is common in our region, particularly with apixaban and rivaroxaban. It is associated with increased risk of stroke and bleeding. More education targeting prescribers is needed to encourage adherence to standard dosing criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anouassi et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial fibrillation (n=608). Inappropriate DOAC dosing vs. Appropriate DOAC dosing was evaluated on Ischemic stroke (p=<0.01). Inappropriate DOAC dosing was associated with increased rates of ischemic stroke (9.9% vs 3.1%, P<0.01) and major bleeding (11.7% vs 6.0%, P=0.04) compared to appropriate dosing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: