Key result
According to the SYNTAX Score II 2020, 55 of 57 patients enrolled in the FASTTRACK CABG trial had a predicted survival benefit with CABG over PCI, confirming the appropriateness of the selected revascularization modality.
Why the study?
Personalized long term vital prognosis is key when deciding between PCI and CABG in complex coronary artery disease; this interim analysis evaluated appropriateness of revascularization modality decisions guided solely by CCTA and FFRCT.
Does CCTA and FFRCT guidance lead to appropriate revascularization decisions compared to SYNTAX Score II 2020 predictions in patients with complex CAD?
Observational (n=57)
Yes
Does CCTA and FFRCT guidance lead to appropriate revascularization decisions compared to SYNTAX Score II 2020 predictions in patients with complex CAD?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients with complex CAD, revascularization decisions guided solely by CCTA and FFRCT aligned with SYNTAX Score II 2020 recommendations, favoring CABG in the vast majority.
Personalized long term vital prognosis plays a key role in deciding between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and CABG in patients with complex coronary artery disease. The FASTTRACK CABG trial enrolls patients with the sole guidance of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) and fractional flow reserve CCTA (FFRCT). The feasibility/non-feasibility of this approach is determined by the surgeon request to have access to the invasive coronary angiography. This interim analysis, which was requested by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB), compared the treatment decision of the “on site” Heart team to the recommended treatment as per the SYNTAX Score II 2020 (SS-2020), which was prospectively assessed by the central core laboratory in the first 57 consecutive patients (half of the planned population) enrolled in this First in Man study. The average anatomical SYTAX Score is 35.6 ± 11.5. The SS-2020 predicted 5-year MACE and 10-year all-cause mortality are 14.7 % and 21.6 % following CABG, and 23.0 % and 30.4 % following PCI. Among the enrolled patients the SS-2020 predicts long-term PCI outcomes similar to CABG (absolute risk difference ≤0 % in favor of PCI) in only two patients whilst the remaining 55 patients had a predicted survival benefit with CABG. According to the SS-2020, the first 57 patients recruited into the FASTTRACK CABG trial received the appropriate modality of revascularization and the DSMB allowed the investigators to complete the study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ninomiya et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Three-vessel disease and/or left main coronary artery disease (n=57). Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery vs. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (predicted) was evaluated on Predicted 5-year MACE (ARD 8.4%, p=<0.001). According to the SYNTAX Score II 2020, 55 of 57 patients enrolled in the FASTTRACK CABG trial had a predicted survival benefit with CABG over PCI, confirming the appropriateness of the selected revascularization modality.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: