Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review evaluates challenges and technologies in graphite recycling for lithium-ion batteries, highlighting economic implications.
The rapid expansion of lithium-ion battery (LIB) use in electric vehicles and large-scale energy storage systems has intensified the need for sustainable end-of-life management. While most research and industrial efforts have focused on recovering valuable metals, graphite anodes, despite constituting a significant portion of battery mass, remain relatively overlooked. This review evaluates current progress in graphite anode recycling, emphasizing technical challenges, scalability, and economic and geopolitical considerations. Conventional recycling methods, including hydrometallurgical, pyrometallurgical, and direct recycling processes, offer viable routes for material recovery but are often constrained by high energy demands, chemical consumption, and degradation of graphite quality. Regenerated graphite exhibits competitive electrochemical performance, with initial Coulombic efficiencies above 90% and reversible capacities comparable to those of commercial materials. In addition, strategies such as surface modification and defect engineering have proven effective in restoring structural integrity and enhancing cycling stability. Despite these advances, major challenges persist in achieving cost-effective, large-scale implementation and consistent material quality suitable for reuse in battery manufacturing. Given increasing supply risks and rapidly rising global demand for graphite, advancing sustainable recycling technologies has become essential. This review emphasizes the need for integrated technological innovation and supportive policy frameworks to enable the development of a circular economy for graphite.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rezaei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: