Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Unified phenomenological study examines energy exchange limits in soft interacting dark energy models, suggesting implications for cosmic acceleration.
Soft IDE OOM note (bilingual EN/RU), version 1.0. We present a unified phenomenological study of a minimal class of soft interacting dark energy (IDE) models: energy exchange of order ~10% of the cosmic acceleration budget through the proxy Q = β H ρDE, wDE = −1, with β ≈ 0.2. This is a distinct scale from β̂ ≈ 0.015 in an earlier low-z IDE analysis (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21362179), used here only for comparison. Using order-of-magnitude (OOM) estimates—H(z)+fσ8 (N=34), simplified EG and ISW×galaxy channels, one Reyes data point, and a ballpark ISW proxy—together with a consistency check against the local conformal-like map β→|γ−1| (Cassini), and branches for DM-only coupling and a phenomenological screening factor S, we separate the fluid transfer (Q) from a field-theoretic reading of the same exchange. Results: at β=0.2, Δχ2 ≡ χ2IDE−χ2ΛCDM ≈ 0.84 on the same N=34. Strong exchange (β ≈ 1) is strongly constrained (Δχ2 ≈ 199). ΛCDM remains a consistent baseline on the probes used. A universal scalar coupling without screening is in clear tension with Cassini; DM-only (αb=0) removes this local tension in the setup considered; screened universal coupling requires Smin ≳ 3.3×103 (not a “light” screening window). Files: Soft_IDE_OOM_EN.pdf (primary), Soft_IDE_OOM_RU.pdf, Soft_IDE_OOM_code_data.zip (reproducibility archive). This note does not replace a full Planck+DESI+CLASS analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aleksey A. Grachev (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: