Key result
Cardiovascular risk factors like non-HDL cholesterol had stronger associations with CHD (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.06-1.28) than with ischemic (HR 0.97) or hemorrhagic stroke (HR 0.76).
Why the study?
Do cardiovascular risk factors have differential effects on coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke in women?
Population
1731 women with incident cardiovascular disease during follow-up and a cohort of 1914 women from the…
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
Differential effects on CVD subtypes in women may refine risk models; leaves open whether findings alter prevention strategies pending trials.
Cohort (n=3,645)
Do cardiovascular risk factors have differential effects on coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke in women?
Hazard Ratio: 1.16 (95% CI 1.06–1.28)
p-value: p=<0.05
Cardiovascular risk factors have similar effects on CHD and ischemic stroke in women, but differ substantially for hemorrhagic stroke, suggesting distinct biology and the need to separate ischemic and hemorrhagic outcomes in risk prediction.
Leening et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease (CHD and stroke) (n=3,645). Cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., non-HDL cholesterol) vs. Lower levels of risk factors was evaluated on Coronary heart disease (CHD) (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.28, p=<0.05). Cardiovascular risk factors like non-HDL cholesterol had stronger associations with CHD (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.06-1.28) than with ischemic (HR 0.97) or hemorrhagic stroke (HR 0.76).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: