Key result
Among patients with atrial fibrillation, the loss of expected lifetime after incident ischaemic stroke improved from 2000-2010 to 2011-2022 (difference 4.0 months; 95% CI 2.4-5.6; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Data on temporal trends in lost lifetime after developing cardiovascular complications following atrial fibrillation are sparse.
Has the loss of expected lifetime associated with cardiovascular complications in patients with atrial fibrillation improved between 2000-2010 and 2011-2022?
Cohort
Yes
Has the loss of expected lifetime associated with cardiovascular complications in patients with atrial fibrillation improved between 2000-2010 and 2011-2022?
Mean Difference: 4 (95% CI 2.4–5.6)
Absolute Event Rate: -1.8% vs -2.1%
p-value: p=< 0.001
The loss of expected lifetime after incident ischaemic stroke, heart failure, and myocardial infarction in patients with atrial fibrillation has modestly improved over the past two decades, whereas no improvement was seen for bleeding complications.
AIMS: While advancements in care may improve the clinical course of atrial fibrillation (AF), data on trends in lost lifetime after developing cardiovascular complications are sparse. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this nationwide registry-based matched cohort study (1 January 2000-31 December 2022), we followed patients with ischaemic stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, heart failure (HF), and myocardial infarction (MI) after AF and matched referents with AF. We estimated the average loss of life expectancy as the difference in restricted mean survival time between patients with AF with and without a complication and compared the loss between 2000-10 and 2011-22. We followed 27 809 patients with ischaemic stroke, 28 938 with gastrointestinal bleeding, 7710 with intracranial bleeding, 50 914 with HF, and 14 141 with MI and their matched referents. The loss of lifetime improved for ischaemic stroke [-2.1 vs. -1.8 years; difference 4.0 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.4-5.6; P < 0.001]. We found no evidence of trends for gastrointestinal (-1.7 vs. -1.8 years; difference -0.8 months, 95% CI -2.5 to 0.8; P = 0.32) or intracranial bleeding (-3.3 vs. -3.1 years; difference 1.6 months, 95% CI -1.3 to 4.6; P = 0.28). The loss of lifetime improved for HF (-2.1 vs. -1.9 years; difference 2.4 months, 95% CI 0.9-3.8; P = 0.001) and MI (-1.6 vs. -1.1 years; difference 5.9 months, 95% CI 3.3-8.5; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Among patients with AF, the loss of expected lifetime after incident ischaemic stroke, HF, and MI improved modestly over the past two decades but not after gastrointestinal or intracranial bleeding. These findings support the development and evaluation of interventions that prevent and reduce severity of complications after AF, particularly for bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vinter et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation with cardiovascular complications. Later time period (2011-2022) vs. Earlier time period (2000-2010) was evaluated on Average loss of life expectancy after ischaemic stroke (difference in restricted mean survival time) (MD 4.0 months, 95% CI 2.4-5.6, p=< 0.001). Among patients with atrial fibrillation, the loss of expected lifetime after incident ischaemic stroke improved from 2000-2010 to 2011-2022 (difference 4.0 months; 95% CI 2.4-5.6; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: