Key result
Drinking a 500 mL bolus of cold water did not significantly increase orthostatic tolerance time compared to room temperature water (33 vs 31 minutes, p=0.3321) in healthy adults.
Why the study?
Room temperature water boluses improve orthostatic tolerance, but whether water temperature modifies this effect or the cardiovascular responses to orthostatic stress is unclear.
Does drinking ice-cold or warm water improve orthostatic tolerance compared to room temperature water in healthy adults?
RCT (n=14)
Single-blind
Randomised crossover
No
Does drinking ice-cold or warm water improve orthostatic tolerance compared to room temperature water in healthy adults?
Absolute Event Rate: 33% vs 31%
p-value: p=0.3321
While cold water bolus ingestion significantly improves orthostatic cardiovascular responses (increasing stroke volume and systolic blood pressure), it does not significantly prolong the time to presyncope compared to room temperature water in healthy individuals.
Does not support cold water boluses for orthostatic tolerance in healthy adults; leaves open potential benefits in patients with intolerance.
PURPOSE: Bolus water drinking, at room temperature, has been shown to improve orthostatic tolerance (OT), probably via sympathetic activation; however, it is not clear whether the temperature of the water bolus modifies the effect on OT or the cardiovascular responses to orthostatic stress. The aim of this study was to assess whether differing water temperature of the water bolus would alter time to presyncope and/or cardiovascular parameters during incremental orthostatic stress. METHODS: Fourteen participants underwent three head-up tilt (HUT) tests with graded lower body negative pressure (LBNP) continued until presyncope. Fifteen minutes prior to each HUT, participants drank a 500 mL bolus of water which was randomised, in single-blind crossover fashion, to either room temperature water (20 °C) (ROOM), ice-cold water (0-3 °C) (COLD) or warm water (45 °C) (WARM). Cardiovascular parameters were monitored continuously. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in OT in the COLD (33 ± 3 min; p = 0.3321) and WARM (32 ± 3 min; p = 0.6764) conditions in comparison to the ROOM condition (31 ± 3 min). During the HUT tests, heart rate and cardiac output were significantly reduced (p < 0.0073), with significantly increased systolic blood pressure, stroke volume, cerebral blood flow velocity and total peripheral resistance (p < 0.0054), in the COLD compared to ROOM conditions. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy controls, bolus cold water drinking results in favourable orthostatic cardiovascular responses during HUT/LBNP without significantly altering OT. Using a cold water bolus may result in additional benefits in patients with orthostatic intolerance above those conferred by bolus water at room temperature (by ameliorating orthostatic tachycardia and enhancing vascular resistance responses). Further research in patients with orthostatic intolerance is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parsons et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Healthy participants (n=14). Ice-cold water (0-3°C) vs. Room temperature water (20°C) was evaluated on Orthostatic tolerance (time to presyncope in minutes) (p=0.3321). Drinking a 500 mL bolus of cold water did not significantly increase orthostatic tolerance time compared to room temperature water (33 vs 31 minutes, p=0.3321) in healthy adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: