Key result
Non-invasive testing of autonomic cardiovascular control demonstrated insufficient consistency across 36 studies to reliably discriminate between normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia.
Why the study?
Can non-invasive testing of autonomic cardiovascular control discriminate between normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia?
Systematic Review
Can non-invasive testing of autonomic cardiovascular control discriminate between normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia?
Current non-invasive methods for assessing autonomic cardiovascular control are insufficient to reliably distinguish between normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Non-invasive autonomic monitoring in early pregnancy may aid pre-eclampsia risk stratification; leaves open need for prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Rang et al. (2002) conducted a systematic review in Pre-eclampsia. Non-invasive testing of autonomic cardiovascular control vs. Normal pregnancy was evaluated on Discrimination between healthy pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Non-invasive testing of autonomic cardiovascular control demonstrated insufficient consistency across 36 studies to reliably discriminate between normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: