Key result
The QardioArm blood pressure monitor and mobile app demonstrated high reliability (ICC 0.80-0.95) and validity (r > .96) compared to the Omron M3 criterion device.
Why the study?
Does the QardioArm blood pressure monitor provide reliable and valid measurements compared to the Omron M3 in healthy volunteers?
Observational (n=100)
No
Does the QardioArm blood pressure monitor provide reliable and valid measurements compared to the Omron M3 in healthy volunteers?
The QardioArm mobile app and wireless blood pressure monitor is a valid and reliable tool for self-measurement of blood pressure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
QardioArm meets ESH validation criteria for home BP monitoring; supports accuracy claims in general adults but leaves broader adoption open pending real-world data.
BACKGROUND Self-measurement of blood pressure is a priority strategy for managing blood pressure. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of blood pressure and heart rate following the European Society of Hypertension’s international validation protocol, as measured with the QardioArm, a fully automatic, noninvasive wireless blood pressure monitor and mobile app. METHODS A total of 100 healthy volunteers older than 25 years from the general population of Ciudad Real, Spain, participated in a test-retest validation study with two measurement sessions separated by 5 to 7 days. In each measurement session, seven systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate assessments were taken, alternating between the two devices. The test device was the QardioArm and the previously validated criterion device was the Omron M3. Sessions took place at a single study site with an evaluation room that was maintained at an appropriate temperature and kept free from noises and distractions. RESULTS The QardioArm displayed very consistent readings both within and across sessions (intraclass correlation coefficients=0.80-0.95, standard errors of measurement=2.5-5.4). The QardioArm measurements corresponded closely to those from the criterion device (r>.96) and mean values for the two devices were nearly identical. The QardioArm easily passed all validation standards set by the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. CONCLUSIONS The QardioArm mobile app has validity and it can be used free of major measurement error.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mazoteras‐Pardo et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=100). QardioArm vs. Omron M3 was evaluated on Reliability and validity of blood pressure and heart rate (ICC 0.80-0.95; r > .96). The QardioArm blood pressure monitor and mobile app demonstrated high reliability (ICC 0.80-0.95) and validity (r > .96) compared to the Omron M3 criterion device.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: