Key result
Black race is not associated with differing odds of cardiologist care across hospital segregation levels.
Why the study?
Racial disparities exist in clinical outcomes for valvular heart disease, but whether clinician segregation contributes to these disparities remains unknown.
Does clinician team segregation and patient race affect the receipt of cardiology care, 30-day readmission, and 1-year survival in insured patients with valvular heart disease?
Observational (n=8,649)
Yes
Does clinician team segregation and patient race affect the receipt of cardiology care, 30-day readmission, and 1-year survival in insured patients with valvular heart disease?
While race was not associated with receipt of cardiology care or survival for insured VHD patients, Black patients without cardiology care in low-segregation hospitals face a significantly higher risk of 30-day readmission.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No racial disparity in cardiology care seen among insured VHD patients; leaves open segregation effects on outcomes in broader populations.
AIMS: Racial disparities exist in clinical outcomes for valvular heart disease (VHD). It is unknown whether clinician segregation contributes to these disparities. Among an adequately insured population, we evaluated the relationship between clinician segregation in a hospital and receipt of care by a cardiologist according to patient race. We also evaluated the association between clinician segregation, race and care by a cardiologist on 30-day readmission and 1-year survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using Optum's Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (CDM, US commercial and Medicare beneficiaries) from 2010 to 2018, we identified patients with a primary diagnosis of VHD. Hospitals were categorized into low, medium and high segregation groups (SG), according to clinician segregation index (SI). SI can range from 0-1 (0: the ratio of Black to White patients is the same for all clinicians; 1: each clinician treats only Black or only White patients). Outcomes were analysed using generalized linear mixed effect models. Among 8649 patients [median age 75 (67-82), 45.4% female, 16.1% Black, 83.9% White], odds of care from a cardiologist did not vary across race for all SGs [Low SG adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.79 (95% CI: 0.58-1.08), P = 0.14; Medium SG aOR: 0.86 (95% CI: 0.60-1.25), P = 0.43; High SG aOR: 1.07 (95% CI: 0.68-1.69), P = 0.76]. Among those that received care from a cardiologist, there was no difference in the 30-day readmission between Black and White patients across SGs [Low SG aOR: 1.05 (95% CI: 0.83-1.31), P = 0.70; Medium SG aOR: 1.22 (95% CI: 0.92-1.61), P = 0.17; High SG aOR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.57-1.17), P = 0.27]. Among patients that did not receive care from a cardiologist, Black patients in low SG had higher odds of 30-day readmission compared to White patients [aOR: 2.74 (95%CI:1.38-5.43), P < 0.01]. Odds of 1-year survival were similar across race for all SG irrespective of receipt of care from a cardiologist [seen by a cardiologist: Low SG aOR: 1.13 (95% CI: 0.86-1.48), P = 0.38; Medium SG aOR: 0.83 (95% CI: 0.59-1.17), P = 0.29; High SG aOR: 1.01 (95% CI: 0.66-1.52), P = 0.98; not seen by a cardiologist: Low SG aOR: 0.56 (95% CI: 0.23-1.34), P = 0.19; Medium SG aOR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.28-2.37), P = 0.70; High SG aOR: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.23-1.74), P = 0.37]. CONCLUSIONS: Among an insured population, race was not associated with care by a cardiologist for VHD or survival. Black patients not seen by cardiologists had higher odds of 30-day readmission in low clinician SG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bolakale‐Rufai et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Valvular Heart Disease (n=8,649). Black race vs. White race was evaluated on Receipt of care from a cardiologist in Low Segregation Group hospitals (aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.58-1.08, p=0.14). Among an insured population with valvular heart disease, Black race was not significantly associated with differing odds of receiving care from a cardiologist compared to White race across any hospital clinician segregation group.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: