Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in stage II colon cancer remains challenging. Although multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTs) guide treatment, their recommendations vary. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT may support decision-making, but direct comparative evidence with MDTs is limited. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 179 patients with stage II colon cancer who underwent surgery between 2019-2024. MDT recommendations (observation, fluoropyrimidine monotherapy, or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy) were compared with ChatGPT-5 outputs. Clinical factors - including age, ECOG performance status (PS), tumor stage, minor risk factors, and mismatch repair (MMR) status - were incorporated. Agreement was evaluated using Cohen's kappa (κ) and McNemar's test. RESULTS: Across the three treatment categories, agreement between MDT and AI was moderate (70.4%, κ = 0.542, p < 0.001), while in the binary comparison of adjuvant therapy versus observation, concordance improved to substantial (91.1%, κ = 0.719, p < 0.001). Discordance mainly reflected AI's tendency to escalate therapy. Agreement decreased in patients ≥70 years, those with ECOG PS 2, and those with multiple risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: AI showed moderate agreement with MDTs in detailed three-category recommendations but substantial concordance in binary adjuvant decisions. While AI may serve as a supportive tool, clinical judgment remains essential, particularly for elderly and frail patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Birsin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: