Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Accurate imaging-based response assessment is essential for proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI, endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) and 18F-FAPI PET/MRI for identifying pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by chemoimmunotherapy. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 143 patients. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with 95% confidence intervals. Cohen's κ assessed agreement between imaging-defined complete response (iCR) and pCR. Paired comparisons used Cochran's Q and Holm-adjusted exact McNemar tests. RESULTS: = 25) achieved sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 4.76%, 98.18%, and 48.31%; 30.95%, 87.18%, and 58.02%; and 60.0%, 100.0%, and 84.0%, respectively. PET/MRI-assessed imaging complete response showed substantial agreement with pCR (κ = 0.643). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant SCRT followed by chemoimmunotherapy achieved high pCR rates in pMMR LARC. Conventional MRI and ERUS showed limited sensitivity despite relatively high specificity. 18F-FAPI PET/MRI showed potential diagnostic utility in a small subgroup, but its moderate sensitivity and limited sample size warrant further validation. These findings highlight the limitations of imaging alone and the need for comprehensive response assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: