Key result
Mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by maximal activation delay was independently associated with improved survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy (HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.16-0.77; P=0.01).
Why the study?
Does pre-implant mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by AD-max using cross-correlation analysis predict long-term survival better than other TDI indices in patients receiving CRT?
Population
131 patients referred for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) from two international centres
Comparison
Pre-implant assessment of mechanical… vs Other TDI-derived indices and the presence of…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
truncated at 1460 days
Authors
Loading...
AD-max dyssynchrony supports refined CRT selection; leaves open incremental value over QRS in prospective trials.
Cohort (n=131)
Yes
Does pre-implant mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by AD-max using cross-correlation analysis predict long-term survival better than other TDI indices in patients receiving CRT?
Hazard Ratio: 0.35 (95% CI 0.16–0.77)
p-value: p=0.01
Pre-implant mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by AD-max using cross-correlation analysis is a strong independent predictor of long-term survival after CRT, outperforming other TDI-derived indices.
Risum et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Patients referred for cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=131). Mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by maximal activation delay (AD-max) >35 ms vs. Absence of mechanical dyssynchrony was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality, cardiac transplantation, or implantation of a ventricular assist device (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.16-0.77, p=0.01). Mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by maximal activation delay was independently associated with improved survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy (HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.16-0.77; P=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: