Key result
FT-CMR reveals markedly lower septal myocardial work compared to the lateral wall in LBBB.
Why the study?
Assessing regional myocardial work via speckle tracking echocardiography strain is not always accessible due to poor image quality, prompting investigation of feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance.
Can regional myocardial work be accurately estimated using feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and non-invasive left ventricular pressure in patients with LBBB?
Cross-Sectional (n=46)
Single-blind
Yes
Can regional myocardial work be accurately estimated using feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and non-invasive left ventricular pressure in patients with LBBB?
FT-CMR combined with non-invasive LVP is a feasible clinical tool to measure regional myocardial work, showing good correlation with echocardiography and metabolic demand in LBBB patients.
AIMS: Regional myocardial work may be assessed by pressure-strain analysis using a non-invasive estimate of left ventricular pressure (LVP). Strain by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) is not always accessible due to poor image quality. This study investigated the estimation of regional myocardial work from strain by feature tracking (FT) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and non-invasive LVP. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-seven heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction, left bundle branch block (LBBB), and no myocardial scar were compared to nine controls without LBBB. Circumferential strain was measured by FT-CMR in a mid-ventricular short-axis cine view, and longitudinal strain by STE. Segmental work was calculated by pressure-strain analysis. Twenty-five patients underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography. Segmental values were reported as percentages of the segment with maximum myocardial FDG uptake. In LBBB patients, net CMR-derived work was 51 ± 537 (mean ± standard deviation) in septum vs. 1978 ± 1084 mmHg·% in the left ventricular (LV) lateral wall (P < 0.001). In controls, however, there was homogeneous work distribution with similar values in septum and the LV lateral wall (non-significant). Reproducibility was good. Segmental CMR-derived work correlated with segmental STE-derived work and with segmental FDG uptake (average r = 0.71 and 0.80, respectively). CONCLUSION: FT-CMR in combination with non-invasive LVP demonstrated markedly reduced work in septum compared to the LV lateral wall in patients with LBBB. Work distribution correlated with STE-derived work and energy demand as reflected in FDG uptake. These results suggest that FT-CMR in combination with non-invasive LVP is a relevant clinical tool to measure regional myocardial work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Larsen et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure with left bundle branch block (n=46). Left bundle branch block (LBBB) vs. Healthy controls without LBBB was evaluated on Net CMR-derived myocardial work in the septum versus the left ventricular (LV) lateral wall (p=<0.001). In patients with LBBB, FT-CMR in combination with non-invasive left ventricular pressure demonstrated markedly reduced net myocardial work in the septum (51 mmHg·%) compared to the LV lateral wall (1978 mmHg·%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: