Key result
CMR with non-invasive LVP shows ~97% lower septal versus lateral wall net work in LBBB.
Why the study?
Myocardial work provides a more comprehensive assessment of myocardial function than deformation parameters alone, but strain by speckle tracking echocardiography is not always accessible due to poor image quality.
Does feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance combined with non-invasive left ventricular pressure accurately estimate regional myocardial work compared to echocardiography and PET in patients with LBBB?
Cross-Sectional (n=46)
Does feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance combined with non-invasive left ventricular pressure accurately estimate regional myocardial work compared to echocardiography and PET in patients with LBBB?
Feature tracking CMR combined with non-invasive LV pressure is a feasible method to measure regional myocardial work, correlating well with regional glucose metabolism.
May enable myocardial work assessment when STE images are inadequate; leaves open validation in larger prospective cohorts.
Introduction: Incorporating load and wall tension, myocardial work provides a more comprehensive assessment of myocardial function than deformation parameters alone. Regional myocardial work may be calculated by pressure-strain analysis using a non-invasive estimate of left ventricular pressure (LVP). Strain by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) is not always accessible due to poor image quality. Purpose: To investigate if regional myocardial work can be estimated from strain by feature tracking (FT) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and non-invasive LVP. Methods: 37 heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction, LBBB, and no myocardial scar were compared to nine controls without LBBB. Circumferential strain was measured by FT-CMR in a midventricular short axis cine view, and longitudinal strain by STE. Segmental work was calculated by pressure-strain analysis. 25 patients underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET). Segmental values were reported as percentages of the segment with maximum myocardial FDG uptake. Results: In the LBBB patients, net CMR-derived work was 51 ± 537 (mean ± SD) in septum, and 1978 ± 1084 mmHg·% (p < 0.001) in the LV lateral wall, while there was a homogeneous work distribution in the controls (Figure). Reproducibility was good. Segmental CMR-derived work correlated with segmental STE-derived work and with segmental FDG uptake (average r = 0.71 and 0.80, respectively). Conclusions: FT-CMR in combination with non-invasive LVP is feasible over a large range, and corresponds well with regional glucose metabolism. FT-CMR is a relevant clinical tool to measure regional myocardial work. Abstract 333 Figure. Calculated pressure-strain loops
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Larsen et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and LBBB (n=46). Feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance (FT-CMR) and non-invasive LVP vs. Controls without LBBB was evaluated on Net CMR-derived work in septum vs LV lateral wall in LBBB patients (p=<0.001). Feature tracking CMR combined with non-invasive LVP demonstrated significantly lower net work in the septum (51 mmHg·%) versus the LV lateral wall (1978 mmHg·%, p<0.001) in LBBB patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: