Key result
The ongoing Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial will evaluate the roles of revascularization and ventricular restoration in patients with ischemic heart failure.
Why the study?
What is the role of revascularization and ventricular restoration in patients with ischemic heart failure?
What is the role of revascularization and ventricular restoration in patients with ischemic heart failure?
This review highlights the controversy surrounding revascularization and ventricular restoration in ischemic heart failure and introduces the STICH trial as a means to address these issues.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As techniques for the management of patients with ischemic heart failure have evolved, controversy has arisen with respect to the roles of revascularization and ventricular restoration procedures. This review addresses current thinking on the management of these patients and describes a prospective randomized trial that will have an impact on future treatment selection. RECENT FINDINGS: Although the basis for improved survival with coronary artery bypass grafting lies in the viability of ischemic myocardium, nuclear medicine studies and stress echocardiography have failed to adequately select for tissues that are capable of recovery. Recent studies have suggested an additional benefit to combining ventricular restoration with bypass surgery. However, the role for these techniques has not been definitively established. SUMMARY: The currently enrolling Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial promises to address these issues and thereby improve the management of patients with this disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joyce et al. (2003) conducted a review in ischemic heart failure. revascularization and ventricular restoration was evaluated. The ongoing Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial will evaluate the roles of revascularization and ventricular restoration in patients with ischemic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: