Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) constitute major infiltrates of solid tumors and express a marker profile that characterizes alternatively activated macrophages (MФs). TAMs accumulate in hypoxic tumor regions, express high amounts of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) and contribute to tumor angiogenesis and invasiveness. However, the precise role of HIF-1 on MФ infiltration and phenotype alterations remains poorly defined. Therefore, we cocultured wild type (wt) versus HIF-1α(-/-) MФs with tumor spheroids. Both, wt and HIF-1α(-/-) MФs, infiltrated hypoxic regions of tumor spheroids at equal rates and got alternatively activated. Interestingly, significantly higher amounts of HIF-1α(-/-) MФs expressed the TAM markers CD206 and stabilin-1 compared with wt phagocytes. Stimulation of infiltrated TAMs with lipopolysaccharide (LPS)/interferon-γ revealed a reduced expression of the pro-inflammatory markers interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor-α and inducible nitric oxide synthase in HIF-1α(-/-) MФs. Furthermore, HIF-1α(-/-) MФs were less cytotoxic toward tumor cells. Although infiltration of MФs increased the invasive potential of tumor spheroids independently of HIF-1, the ability to stimulate differentiation of stem cells toward CD31-positive cells was triggered by wt but not by HIF-1α(-/-) MФs. Our data suggest that HIF-1α-deficient MФs develop a more prominent TAM marker profile accompanied by reduced cytotoxicity, whereas HIF-1 seems indispensable for the angiogenesis-promoting properties of TAMs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Werno et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: