Key result
Hypertension is linked to a lower AVI/GLS ratio, indicating worse ventricular-arterial coupling.
Why the study?
This study aimed to assess ventricular-arterial coupling using the ratio of arterial velocity pulse index to global longitudinal strain in hypertension, and evaluate its association with vascular and cardiac damage versus the conventional Ea/Ees index.
Does the AVI/GLS ratio better assess ventricular-arterial coupling and predict early cardiovascular changes compared to the conventional Ea/Ees index in hypertensive patients?
Observational (n=282)
Does the AVI/GLS ratio better assess ventricular-arterial coupling and predict early cardiovascular changes compared to the conventional Ea/Ees index in hypertensive patients?
Absolute Event Rate: -0.77% vs -0.66%
p-value: p=0.001
The AVI/GLS ratio is a more sensitive marker than the traditional Ea/Ees index for detecting altered ventricular-arterial coupling and early cardiovascular changes in hypertension.
AVI/GLS ratio may better capture hypertension-related damage than Ea/Ees; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
OBJECTIVE: Ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) evaluates the relationship between the left ventricle (LV) and the arterial system. This study aimed to assess VAC using the ratio of arterial stiffness (arterial velocity pulse index [AVI]) to myocardial deformation (global longitudinal strain [GLS]) in hypertension, and to determine whether it is more closely associated with vascular and cardiac damage than the conventional arterial elastance/left ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ea/Ees) index. METHODS: AVI, GLS, Ea, Ees, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and markers of left ventricular diastolic function (E/A and E') were measured by echocardiography in 141 healthy controls and 141 hypertensive subjects. RESULT: AVI/GLS ratio was significantly lower in hypertensive individuals compared to controls (-0.77 ± 0.29 vs. -0.66 ± 0.28, P = 0.001). A low AVI/GLS ratio was correlated with age (r = -0.450, P < 0.05) and LVEF (r = 0.243, P < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that the AVI/GLS ratio had higher sensitivity for predicting early cardiovascular changes in hypertensive patients, with an area under the curve of 0.645 (95% confidence interval (CI) [0.565; 0.681]). CONCLUSIONS: Hypertension is associated with worse VAC when expressed by the AVI/GLS ratio compared to normal conditions. The AVI/GLS ratio proved to be more effective than traditional indices (Ea/Ees) in detecting differences in cardiovascular function in hypertensive individuals. The role of the AVI/GLS ratio in various clinical settings requires further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=282). Hypertension vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on AVI/GLS ratio (p=0.001). Hypertension was associated with a significantly lower AVI/GLS ratio compared to healthy controls (-0.77 vs -0.66, P=0.001), indicating worse ventricular-arterial coupling.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: