Key result
Irbesartan administered at 300 mg/day for one year did not significantly affect short- or long-term intradialytic central hemodynamics compared to placebo in newly started hemodialysis patients.
Why the study?
Does irbesartan affect intradialytic central hemodynamics or the frequency of intradialytic hypotension in hemodialysis patients?
RCT (n=82)
Double-blind
Block randomization
Yes
Does irbesartan affect intradialytic central hemodynamics or the frequency of intradialytic hypotension in hemodialysis patients?
p-value: p=≥0.07
Irbesartan can be safely used as an add-on antihypertensive therapy in hemodialysis patients without adversely affecting intradialytic hemodynamics or increasing hypotensive episodes.
Supports irbesartan as safe add-on antihypertensive in hemodialysis; extends RCT evidence for intradialytic hemodynamic neutrality.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Little is known about the tolerability of antihypertensive drugs during hemodialysis treatment. The present study evaluated the use of the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) irbesartan. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, one-year intervention trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-two hemodialysis patients with urine output >300 mL/day and dialysis vintage <1 year. INTERVENTION: Irbesartan/placebo 300 mg/day for 12 months administered as add-on to antihypertensive treatment using a predialytic systolic blood pressure target of 140 mmHg in all patients. OUTCOMES AND MEASUREMENTS: Cardiac output, stroke volume, central blood volume, total peripheral resistance, mean arterial blood pressure, and frequency of intradialytic hypotension. RESULTS: At baseline, the groups were similar regarding age, comorbidity, blood pressure, antihypertensive medication, ultrafiltration volume, and dialysis parameters. Over the one-year period, predialytic systolic blood pressure decreased significantly, but similarly in both groups. Mean start and mean end cardiac output, stroke volume, total peripheral resistance, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure were stable and similar in the two groups, whereas central blood volume increased slightly but similarly over time. The mean hemodynamic response observed during a dialysis session was a drop in cardiac output, in stroke volume, in mean arterial pressure, and in central blood volume, whereas heart rate increased. Total peripheral resistance did not change significantly. Overall, this pattern remained stable over time in both groups and was uninfluenced by ARB treatment. The total number of intradialytic hypotensive episodes was (placebo/ARB) 50/63 (P = 0.4). Ultrafiltration volume, left ventricular mass index, plasma albumin, and change in intradialytic total peripheral resistance were significantly associated with intradialytic hypotension in a multivariate logistic regression analysis based on baseline parameters. CONCLUSION: Use of the ARB irbesartan as an add-on to other antihypertensive therapy did not significantly affect intradialytic hemodynamics, neither in short nor long-term, and no significant increase in hypotensive episodes was seen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00791830.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peters et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Hemodialysis (n=82). Irbesartan vs. Placebo was evaluated on Intradialytic hemodynamic parameters (cardiac output, mean arterial pressure, stroke volume, total peripheral resistance, central blood volume, and heart rate) (p=≥0.07). Irbesartan administered at 300 mg/day for one year did not significantly affect short- or long-term intradialytic central hemodynamics compared to placebo in newly started hemodialysis patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: