Relationship between the Controlling Nutritional Status Score and Infrainguinal Bypass Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Limb-threatening Ischemia

Figures

• 

  Fig. 1 The median and mean Controlling Nutritional Status Scores were 5 and 4.8, respectively.

• 

  Fig. 2 Survival rates of the patients with higher Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Scores (3–12) and those with lower CONUT Scores (0–2) after arterial reconstruction. The postoperative survival rate was lower in the higher score group than in the lower score group (P=0.0043).

• 

  Fig. 3 Graft patency rates of patients with higher Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) scores (8–12) and those with lower CONUT scores (0–7). There was no significant difference in primary and secondary graft patency between the higher and the lower score groups (p=0.91 and 0.58, respectively).

• 

  Fig. 4 Limb salvage in patients with higher Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) scores (8–12) and those with lower CONUT scores (0–7) after arterial reconstruction. The overall limb salvage rate was lower in the higher score group than in the lower score group (P=0.0009).