Key result
Chronic VVI pacing decreased left atrial appendage velocity from 82.4 to 42.1 cm/s (P<0.01) and induced spontaneous echo contrast in 19% of patients, which reversed after restoring AV synchrony.
Why the study?
Does chronic VVI pacing cause mechanical remodeling of the left atrium compared to DDD pacing in patients with permanent pacemakers?
Population
32 patients with permanent pacemakers (n=21 randomized to VVI, n=11 randomized to DDD)
Comparison
Chronic VVI pacing for 3 months, followed by… vs Chronic DDD pacing (AV synchrony) for 3 months
Design
RCT, prospective randomized comparison
Follow-up
3 months
Authors
Loading...
Chronic VVI pacing may elevate thromboembolic risk via atrial remodeling; leaves open whether DDD mode prevents this in broader populations.
RCT (n=32)
Does chronic VVI pacing cause mechanical remodeling of the left atrium compared to DDD pacing in patients with permanent pacemakers?
Absolute Event Rate: 42.1% vs 79.6%
p-value: p=<0.01
Chronic loss of AV synchrony from VVI pacing induces reversible mechanical remodeling of the left atrium, providing a mechanistic explanation for the increased thromboembolic risk compared to AV sequential pacing.
Sparks et al. (1999) conducted an RCT in Permanent pacemakers (n=32). VVI pacing vs. DDD pacing was evaluated on Left atrial appendage (LAA) velocity (p=<0.01). Chronic VVI pacing decreased left atrial appendage velocity from 82.4 to 42.1 cm/s (P<0.01) and induced spontaneous echo contrast in 19% of patients, which reversed after restoring AV synchrony.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: