Key result
Clinical and electrophysiologic criteria, including electrocardiographic clues and pacing maneuvers, are essential for the differential diagnosis of regular supraventricular tachycardias.
Why the study?
What are the clinical and electrophysiologic criteria for the differential diagnosis of regular supraventricular tachycardias?
What are the clinical and electrophysiologic criteria for the differential diagnosis of regular supraventricular tachycardias?
This review outlines the clinical and electrophysiologic criteria necessary for accurately diagnosing and differentiating regular supraventricular tachycardias.
Requires multiple criteria for atypical narrow complex tachycardia diagnosis; leaves open prospective validation before routine adoption.
Clinical and electrophysiologic criteria used for the differential diagnosis of regular supraventricular tachycardias ( SVT ) are presented. Although several electrocardiographic clues may assist differential diagnosis, this is usually accomplished at electrophysiology study and, most often, is between atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia due to a concealed accessory pathway, and atrial tachycardia. Atrial and, mainly, ventricular pacing maneuvers during sinus rhythm or tachycardia have been used with variable success rate. In clinical practice, these techniques cannot be applied to all cases, and multiple criteria have to be used for the differential diagnosis of narrow complex tachycardias with atypical characteristics. Answer questions and earn CME: https://wileyhealthlearning.com/Activity2/4469457/Activity.aspx
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Demosthenes G. Katritsis (2016) conducted a review in Supraventricular tachycardias. Clinical and electrophysiologic criteria was evaluated. Clinical and electrophysiologic criteria, including electrocardiographic clues and pacing maneuvers, are essential for the differential diagnosis of regular supraventricular tachycardias.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: