Key result
Low-temperature electrocautery during high-risk CIED procedures is safe with similar lead dysfunction to conventional electrocautery.
Why the study?
Conventional electrocautery can cause thermal lead injury during high-risk secondary CIED procedures, and few reports exist on low-temperature electrocautery in this setting.
Does low-temperature electrocautery improve safety and efficacy in patients undergoing high-risk CIED procedures?
Observational (n=586)
No
Does low-temperature electrocautery improve safety and efficacy in patients undergoing high-risk CIED procedures?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 1.6%
p-value: p=NS
This analysis aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-temperature electrocautery for mitigating bleeding and lead damage risks during complex CIED procedures.
With rising numbers of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) implanted each year, the population of patients with those devices is growing extensively [1].Large numbers of those patients will eventually require secondary procedures, including device replacements, or upgrades.As during past years , the implanted systems become surrounded by adhesive tissue and fibers, the secondary procedures have been historically associated with a higher risk of short-and long-term complications, most often including lead damage.Moreover, due to comorbidities, a high percentage of patients with CIEDs are treated nowadays with anticoagulants, which increases the risk of bleeding and pocket hematoma.Thus, electrocautery is used to mitigate the risk of periprocedural bleeding.However, the use of conventional electrocautery can risk lead dysfunction due to its thermal injury.The low-temperature electrocautery has been proven to improve local outcomes [2].Few reports were published to date on its utilization in CIED-related procedures [3][4][5].The aim of this analysis was to summarize its safety and efficacy in higher complication-risk procedures performed in a tertiary Polish center.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dyrbuś et al. (2023) conducted an observational in High-risk cardiac implantable electronic device procedures (n=586). Low-temperature electrocautery (PlasmaBlade) vs. Conventional electrocautery was evaluated on Lead dysfunction at 12 months (p=NS). Low-temperature electrocautery during high-risk cardiac implantable electronic device procedures was safe, with 0% lead dysfunction at 12 months compared to 1.6% with conventional electrocautery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: