Key result
Same-day discharge PCI yields comparable safety and clinical outcomes to inpatient PCI while optimizing costs.
Why the study?
Despite clinical and socioeconomic benefits of same-day discharge PCI, challenges remain before routine implementation, requiring guidance to prevent unnecessary hospitalization and unsafe discharges.
Does same-day discharge (outpatient) PCI provide comparable efficacy, safety, and socioeconomic benefits to inpatient PCI in patients with coronary artery disease?
Does same-day discharge (outpatient) PCI provide comparable efficacy, safety, and socioeconomic benefits to inpatient PCI in patients with coronary artery disease?
Same-day discharge following PCI is a safe and cost-effective approach for appropriately selected patients, and its implementation can be facilitated by standardized periprocedural management checklists.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support same-day discharge after PCI to cut costs; leaves open need for randomized safety data.
Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are the cornerstone of treatment in patients with coronary artery disease, generating substantial costs for the healthcare system. Considerable improvements in PCI technique, stent technology, and antiplatelet therapy led to a complication rate of <5%, a success rate of >95%, and lack of routine cardiothoracic surgical support. Thereby, the concept of same-day discharge following PCI has been proposed due to comparable efficacy, safety, and socioeconomic benefits of inpatient PCI. Although single-vessel disease was the primary indication for outpatient (OP) PCI, more complex scenarios such as multivessel disease, left main disease, and chronic total occlusions were also shown to be feasible and safe in the OP setting. Currently, available data show that OP PCI leads to cost optimization, increased capacity of PCI centers, decrease in the nosocomial infections rate, and increased patient satisfaction, along with good clinical outcomes. Although OP PCI seems promising in a subset of well-prepared and compliant patients without severe comorbidities, there are some challenges to overcome before its routine implementation. To prevent unnecessary hospitalization and unsafe same-day discharges, interventional cardiology teams should be trained to perform reliable risk-benefit assessments. Standardized forms should be created to obtain informed consent and instruct OP PCI patients and their relatives about postprocedural management. Here, we summarize the available data on OP and inpatient PCI outcomes, discuss the opportunities and challenges of OP PCI, and propose a periprocedural patient management checklist to facilitate the implementation of OP PCI in interventional cardiology centers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gąsecka et al. (2024) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease. Outpatient percutaneous coronary intervention (same-day discharge) vs. Inpatient percutaneous coronary intervention (overnight hospitalization) was evaluated. Outpatient percutaneous coronary intervention with same-day discharge is a safe and efficient alternative to inpatient PCI, offering comparable clinical outcomes and cost optimization.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: