Key result
Dual antithrombotic therapy significantly reduces the risk of major bleeding compared to triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, without a significant increase in ischemic events.
Why the study?
Optimal antithrombotic therapy is challenging in AF patients undergoing PCI, as triple antithrombotic therapy carries a significant bleeding risk.
Does triple antithrombotic therapy increase bleeding risk without significant clinical benefit compared to dual antithrombotic therapy in patients with AF undergoing PCI with DES?
Does triple antithrombotic therapy increase bleeding risk without significant clinical benefit compared to dual antithrombotic therapy in patients with AF undergoing PCI with DES?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Triple antithrombotic therapy in AF patients undergoing PCI with DES is associated with increased bleeding risk without significant clinical benefit compared to dual antithrombotic therapy, supporting a shift towards DAT.
BACKGROUND: Optimal antithrombotic therapy depicts a challenge to clinicians treating atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Theoretically, these patients would require a combination therapy of oral anticoagulant and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor, known as triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT). However, TAT is known to carry a significant risk of bleeding. The purpose of the present paper is to provide a focused review of the evidence about the safety of TAT as well as to address contemporary directions regarding antithrombotic therapy following PCI in patients with AF who received a drug-eluting stent. MAIN BODY: Novel oral anticoagulant studies consistently demonstrated a better safety profile when compared to Vitamin K antagonist (warfarin), especially in AF patients who have other indications of DAPT after PCI. Evidence from several studies showed that the use of TAT in AF patients undergoing stent implantation or PCI has no significant clinical benefit with more risk of major bleeding when compared to DAT. Therefore, the current recommendations for AF have taken into account the mounting evidence of antithrombotic treatment after PCI in AF patients, which has caused a major shift away from the TAT strategy toward DAT over time. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiologists face challenges in determining the best antithrombotic treatment for AF patients after PCI with DES implantation. Growing data suggest that TAT is associated with considerable bleeding and worse safety, without significant effectiveness. Hence, TAT is strictly applied for individuals with significant thrombotic risk and low bleeding risk, and for a limited duration. This paper highlights the safety concerns of TAT and current trends in antithrombotic therapy after PCI in patients with AF and DES.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alshahrani et al. (2023) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation and percutaneous coronary intervention. Dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) vs. Triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) was evaluated on Major bleeding. Dual antithrombotic therapy significantly reduces the risk of major bleeding compared to triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, without a significant increase in ischemic events.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: