Key result
Lipid accumulation product best predicts NAFLD, linked to ~15% greater risk.
Why the study?
The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of lipid-related parameters reflecting central obesity—CMI, VAI, and LAP—in diagnosing NAFLD and to compare their predictive abilities.
Do lipid-related parameters (CMI, VAI, LAP) accurately diagnose non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,878)
Yes
Do lipid-related parameters (CMI, VAI, LAP) accurately diagnose non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in adults?
Odds Ratio: 1.15 (95% CI 1.11–1.2)
Lipid accumulation product (LAP) is a strong clinical indicator for identifying non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, outperforming CMI and VAI.
CMI, VAI, and LAP may support NAFLD screening in observational data; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Background: Cardiometabolic index (CMI), visceral adiposity index (VAI), and lipid accumulation product (LAP) are lipid-related parameters that reflect central obesity, which is closely associated with the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of these lipid-related parameters in diagnosing NAFLD and to compare their predictive abilities. Methods: This population-based study extracted datasets from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2020. CMI, VAI, and LAP were included in the multivariate logistic model as both continuous and categorical variables to assess the relationship between different lipid-related parameters and NAFLD. To further elucidate this connection, we utilized restricted cubic splines and conducted subgroup analysis. Additionally, the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was employed to evaluate the predictive effectiveness of CMI, VAI, and LAP for NAFLD. Results: The study included 2,878 adults as the study population, of whom 1,263 participants were diagnosed with NAFLD. When lipid-related parameters were analyzed as continuous variables, they showed a positive correlation with NAFLD. The OR(95%CI) were 2.29(1.81,2.89) for CMI (per 1-unit), 1.40(1.28,1.52) for VAI (per 1-unit) and 1.15(1.11,1.20) for LAP (per 10-units). This correlation remains statistically significant when the lipid-related parameters are analyzed as categorical variables. In descending order of diagnostic capability for NAFLD, the AUC values are as follows: LAP (0.794), CMI (0.752), and VAI (0.719). Conclusion: CMI, VAI, and LAP may be important clinical indicators for identifying NAFLD, with LAP demonstrating the best predictive ability among them.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (n=2,878). Lipid accumulation product (LAP), cardiometabolic index (CMI), and visceral adiposity index (VAI) vs. Lower levels of lipid-related parameters was evaluated on Diagnosis of NAFLD (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.11, 1.20). Lipid accumulation product (LAP) demonstrated the best predictive ability for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with an AUC of 0.794, and each 10-unit increase in LAP was associated with a 15% higher risk (OR 1.15).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: