Key result
Sympathetic stimulation via norepinephrine infusion or lower body negative pressure did not significantly antagonize endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the forearm vasculature of normal subjects.
Why the study?
Does sympathetic stimulation via norepinephrine infusion or lower body negative pressure attenuate endothelium-dependent vasodilation in normal subjects?
Does sympathetic stimulation via norepinephrine infusion or lower body negative pressure attenuate endothelium-dependent vasodilation in normal subjects?
Sympathetic stimulation induced by norepinephrine or lower body negative pressure does not potently antagonize endothelium-dependent vasodilation, suggesting other mechanisms cause this abnormality in heart failure.
Sympathetic activation does not fully explain endothelial dysfunction in HF; leaves open other mechanisms for targeted study.
BACKGROUND: Endothelium-dependent dilatation of forearm resistance vessels is attenuated in patients with heart failure. Activation of the sympathetic nervous system could cause this abnormality by way of vasoconstriction and chemical inactivation of nitric oxide. METHODS AND RESULTS: The effects of concurrent intra-arterial norepinephrine infusions (25, 50 and 100 ng/min) on forearm blood flow responses to equipotent doses of an endothelium-dependent vasodilator, methacholine (0.3 and 1.5 micrograms/min), and an endothelium-independent vasodilator, nitroprusside (1 and 5 micrograms/min), were studied in 12 normal subjects. Norepinephrine infusions increased the mean plasma norepinephrine from 255 pg/ml at baseline to 460, 629, and 1089 pg/ml, respectively. Basal forearm blood flow was reduced from 2.9 to 1.6 ml/min/100 ml of forearm volume at the highest dose (p < 0.01). The average response to the lowest dose of methacholine (4.5 ml/min/100 ml) was not significantly reduced by concurrent infusion of norepinephrine (4.4, 4.2, and 4.3 ml/min/100 ml, respectively), whereas the response to the higher dose of methacholine (8.9 ml/min/100 ml) tended to be lower (7.2, 6.7, and 7.4 ml/min/100 ml, respectively) but did not attain statistical significance. Methacholine induced vasodilation was not more sensitive to norepinephrine than nitroprusside responses. Lower body negative pressure (-20 mm Hg) also significantly reduced baseline forearm flow and increased plasma norepinephrine but did not effect either methacholine or nitroprusside induced vasodilation. CONCLUSION: Sympathetic stimulation induced by infusion of norepinephrine or lower body negative pressure is not a potent antagonist to endothelium-dependent vasodilation of the forearm vasculature. These data suggest that sympathetic activation does not completely explain the abnormal endothelium-dependent vasodilation seen in patients with heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rector et al. (1993) studied Healthy (n=12). Norepinephrine infusion vs. Baseline (no norepinephrine) was evaluated on Forearm blood flow response to methacholine (endothelium-dependent vasodilation). Sympathetic stimulation via norepinephrine infusion or lower body negative pressure did not significantly antagonize endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the forearm vasculature of normal subjects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: