Key result
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for primary prevention reduce all-cause mortality in younger patients (<65-70 years) with heart failure, but this benefit is attenuated in older patients.
Why the study?
Does ICD implantation for primary prevention reduce all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure, and does this benefit vary by age?
Does ICD implantation for primary prevention reduce all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure, and does this benefit vary by age?
ICD therapy for primary prevention in heart failure provides a significant survival benefit in younger patients, but this benefit is attenuated in the elderly due to competing non-arrhythmic mortality risks.
Authors
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports broader ICD use in HF; extends RCT evidence via contemporary meta-analysis.
Boriani et al. (2017) conducted a review in Heart failure with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy). Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) vs. Usual care / Control was evaluated. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for primary prevention reduce all-cause mortality in younger patients (<65-70 years) with heart failure, but this benefit is attenuated in older patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: